<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4 changes that would make WordPress even better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leonpaternoster.com/2009/01/4-changes-that-would-make-wordpress-even-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leonpaternoster.com/2009/01/4-changes-that-would-make-wordpress-even-better/</link>
	<description>Web writing, planning and design from Ipswich, Suffolk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://leonpaternoster.com/2009/01/4-changes-that-would-make-wordpress-even-better/comment-page-1/#comment-25513</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leonpaternoster.com/?p=380#comment-25513</guid>
		<description>That looks great, Kaspars; thanks for pointing me to it.

And it&#039;s quite easy to make your theme act in this way (although not with all the options your plugin offers): just register a widget area and call it something like &lt;code&gt;Single page sidebar&lt;/code&gt; and then make sure that only &lt;code&gt;single.php&lt;/code&gt; refers to it. If you&#039;re using &lt;code&gt;sidebar.php&lt;/code&gt; then you&#039;d need to use some conditional code with &lt;code&gt;is_page&lt;/code&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looks great, Kaspars; thanks for pointing me to it.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s quite easy to make your theme act in this way (although not with all the options your plugin offers): just register a widget area and call it something like <code>Single page sidebar</code> and then make sure that only <code>single.php</code> refers to it. If you&#8217;re using <code>sidebar.php</code> then you&#8217;d need to use some conditional code with <code>is_page</code>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaspars</title>
		<link>http://leonpaternoster.com/2009/01/4-changes-that-would-make-wordpress-even-better/comment-page-1/#comment-25507</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaspars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leonpaternoster.com/?p=380#comment-25507</guid>
		<description>For contextual widgets you might try the &lt;a href=&quot;http://konstruktors.com/blog/projects-services/wordpress-plugins/widget-context/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Widget Context plugin&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For contextual widgets you might try the <a href="http://konstruktors.com/blog/projects-services/wordpress-plugins/widget-context/" rel="nofollow">Widget Context plugin</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://leonpaternoster.com/2009/01/4-changes-that-would-make-wordpress-even-better/comment-page-1/#comment-2455</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leonpaternoster.com/?p=380#comment-2455</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wordpress would lose its simplicity if it added custom data types. Maybe that means it should be a forked project?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Or maybe leave as is and encourage developers to write plugins that provide additional functionality, a la Firefox.

There are lots of differences, though: WordPress &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; getting more and more feature filled (check out the work that &lt;code&gt;php wp_list_comments()&lt;/code&gt; does in 2.8, while updates tend to entail a lot more development work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>WordPress would lose its simplicity if it added custom data types. Maybe that means it should be a forked project?</p></blockquote>
<p>Or maybe leave as is and encourage developers to write plugins that provide additional functionality, a la Firefox.</p>
<p>There are lots of differences, though: WordPress <em>is</em> getting more and more feature filled (check out the work that <code>php wp_list_comments()</code> does in 2.8, while updates tend to entail a lot more development work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Johnson</title>
		<link>http://leonpaternoster.com/2009/01/4-changes-that-would-make-wordpress-even-better/comment-page-1/#comment-2386</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leonpaternoster.com/?p=380#comment-2386</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right that Wordpress would lose its simplicity if it added custom data types. Maybe that means it should be a forked project?

The thing about Wordpress that makes it attractive as a CMS tool is that it&#039;s easy for non-technical clients/users to operate. If the Wordpress team created a full CMS application, I&#039;m sure they&#039;d make it easier to use than Expression Engine, Drupal or Joomla.

But since that doesn&#039;t seem to be on the horizon, I&#039;m still hoping that Expression Engine 2 and beyond will bridge the gap. Right now it&#039;s hardly an intuitive tool for backend users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right that WordPress would lose its simplicity if it added custom data types. Maybe that means it should be a forked project?</p>
<p>The thing about WordPress that makes it attractive as a CMS tool is that it&#8217;s easy for non-technical clients/users to operate. If the WordPress team created a full CMS application, I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;d make it easier to use than Expression Engine, Drupal or Joomla.</p>
<p>But since that doesn&#8217;t seem to be on the horizon, I&#8217;m still hoping that Expression Engine 2 and beyond will bridge the gap. Right now it&#8217;s hardly an intuitive tool for backend users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://leonpaternoster.com/2009/01/4-changes-that-would-make-wordpress-even-better/comment-page-1/#comment-2366</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 08:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leonpaternoster.com/?p=380#comment-2366</guid>
		<description>Maybe there&#039;d be a way of assigning widgets to top level pages as well as certain templates. It&#039;d take some thinking through.

This article was going to be called &#8220;5 changes&#8230;&#8221;, with your pie&#8211;in&#8211;the&#8211;sky suggestion as number 5. WordPress is still blogging software at heart; your suggestion would make it a full &lt;abbr title=&quot;Content Management System&quot;&gt;CMS&lt;/abbr&gt;. There are plugins that can help do this (and enable AJAX editing).

The problem with adding custom data types would be that it would perhaps lose its simplicity. But that&#039;ll be the big change&#8212;I wonder when/if it&#039;ll ever happen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe there&#8217;d be a way of assigning widgets to top level pages as well as certain templates. It&#8217;d take some thinking through.</p>
<p>This article was going to be called &#8220;5 changes&hellip;&#8221;, with your pie&ndash;in&ndash;the&ndash;sky suggestion as number 5. WordPress is still blogging software at heart; your suggestion would make it a full <abbr title="Content Management System">CMS</abbr>. There are plugins that can help do this (and enable AJAX editing).</p>
<p>The problem with adding custom data types would be that it would perhaps lose its simplicity. But that&#8217;ll be the big change&mdash;I wonder when/if it&#8217;ll ever happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Johnson</title>
		<link>http://leonpaternoster.com/2009/01/4-changes-that-would-make-wordpress-even-better/comment-page-1/#comment-2354</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leonpaternoster.com/?p=380#comment-2354</guid>
		<description>I think making widgets contextual would be a great improvement. I&#039;m envisioning two checkboxes at the bottom of each widget giving you the choice to have a widget appear on &quot;post&quot; pages and everywhere else. Anything more complicated should probably be handled by custom PHP conditionals. 

As for pie in the sky feature requests, I&#039;d like to see custom data/post types like you can get in Expression Engine or Drupal (with the CCK addon). I would also love to see on-page AJAX editing abilities, like you get when using Flickr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think making widgets contextual would be a great improvement. I&#8217;m envisioning two checkboxes at the bottom of each widget giving you the choice to have a widget appear on &#8220;post&#8221; pages and everywhere else. Anything more complicated should probably be handled by custom PHP conditionals. </p>
<p>As for pie in the sky feature requests, I&#8217;d like to see custom data/post types like you can get in Expression Engine or Drupal (with the CCK addon). I would also love to see on-page AJAX editing abilities, like you get when using Flickr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
