Why I don’t like Tumblr & Posterous

It’s a shame when bloggers move from traditional, essay–style blogs to Tumblr and Posterous.

Actually, I don’t mind Posterous and Tumblr at all (rubbish markup aside). But there are very few Tumblogs I’d bother following.

According to Tumblr, a tumblog

…lets you effortlessly share anything. Post text, photos, quotes, links, music, and videos, from your browser, phone, desktop, email, or wherever you happen to be. You can customize everything, from colors, to your theme’s HTML. Tumblr about page

Which is all well and good. It’s pretty handy being able to publish stuff quickly with a minimum of fuss. Reading or looking at other people’s stuff is a more patchy affair. Your mileage may vary, as they say, but I’d rather read a blog post about a video, image or story — 100 words is just fine — than just be pointed to it (indeed, these sorts of posts can often spark interesting ideas).

It’s a shame when bloggers switch from standard blog software like WordPress to Tumblr (Cameron Moll, for example). Before, we benefited from an expert’s opinion and/or good writing, now we just get a stream of links and disconnected commentary. It’s a more passive experience: writer points to x and reader dutifully follows.

And although comments can be a pain in the backside, they have far more character (and interest, sometimes) than a list of trackbacks or, worse still, a list of x liked this-s. So what? These sorts of lists often indicate how well regarded the author is, rather than the value of what is posted.

Screenshot of a page from Cameron Moll's website: a list of people who liked a post

Cameron Moll has moved from a traditional blog to Tumblr. And lots of people liked this.

I can understand why authors want to break free from the tyranny of writing several hundred words to a schedule. It’s hard work. And long blog post after long blog post gets monotonous for the reader. Perhaps a lot of what are now popular blogs started at a time when there was plenty to rail against (tables, websites built for one browser, unreadable typography etc.) and the didactic post was necessary to get the message about standards, readability etc. across.

After a while, the posts dry up and the author who still likes publishing stuff begins to consider the tumblog.

If you were to design a blog from scratch it’s maybe unlikely you’d base it on a series of discursive posts, and you no doubt would incorporate links to stuff. Perhaps the form needs a rethink.

Filed under: Articles, Favourite

Tags: , , , ,

Next post:

← Previous post:

Comments

  1. It’s a matter of discipline – Tumblr and Posterous makes it almost too easy to post right about anything.

    This is in and by itself isn’t a bad thing but having such a low barrier to entry also means it is very easy to write sloppy posts and quit the thing.

    This is the reason I only subscribe to a single Tumblr-thing – the general quality is simply too low (that and the horrible name, Tumblr.. Tumblog..).

  2. Leon says:

    Yes, there’s not much in it for readers, I find. It’s more about the author’s popularity rather than any inherent value in the posts.

    Besides, Twitter and Delicious serve the same function; Tumblr just dresses link lists up as blogs.

  3. Exactly.

    Though I guess Twitter and Delicious also have additional purposes which to some extent justify their existence (Twitter = “conversations”; Delicious = “cloud bookmarks”).

    I miss the “links of the week/month” blog posts that were so abundant a few years ago. Usually a list with 2-5 links, each accompanied by a few lines of summary.

  4. There isn’t as much value in a true “Tumblog” versus a normal blog. However, I really have to give a thumbs up to the Tumblr platform. It’s user interface is mega-easy to understand. It even makes WordPress seem a little clunky. I have no qualms about recommending it as a blogging platform for web content newbies.

  5. Pat says:

    I think I understand your frustration, but the issue is the individual, not the software. I personally do not have comments or “likes” and “reblogs” displayed on my site, so that isn’t really an issue for me. I do a mixture of links and longer-form writing. Other bloggers like Jorge Quinteros, Marco Arment, and Chris Bowler do a great job of writing interesting long-form content on their Tumblr blogs.

  6. Very well said, Pat. Yours (as well as Jorge’s, Marco’s, and Chris’) are some of the first that come to mind when I think of “Tumblr done right”

  7. Leon says:

    Yeah, I like the interface too, and the fact that the website home page is a huge sign up form. It’s more the content it encourages, especially when it’s compared to “normal” blogging software.

  8. Leon says:

    Thanks for your comment, Pat. It’s more the transition from “normal” blogging software (such as WordPress) to Tumblr. I’m sure you can write long–form texts with Tumblr (although I seem to remember not having much control of the HTML when I had a tumblog), but the format doesn’t encourage it: it’s not built to do that, really. There’s nothing wrong with Tumblr per se, I just think that the more bloggers that move from WordPress to Tumblr and Posterous, the more we’ll lose.

    Tumblr’s not as bad as Posterous (style tags within the document’s body?), but I wouldn’t be happy publishing code like that.

    Oh, and the black bean turkey looks lovely :)

  9. Amrinder says:

    I agree with you, Leon. Some of these famous designers have started posting links lately, like Dan Cederholm. Visit their site and 90 times out of 100 you will find links to other site. Once you get famous people with agree with you and follow you, no matter what you post or link to.

  10. Mike Mai says:

    i love both tumblr and posterous. tumblr is extremely easy to customize or embed on my own website. nothing beats it. posterous, the name says it all, it’ll post everywhere with one click. i write longer posts a few times a month and posterous is great for it. i have abandoned wordpress all together for blogging. still a good cms though.

  11. Andrés says:

    In my opinion, you nailed it with this post.

  12. Joey says:

    It is now September 2011, and Tumblr has continued to grow exponentially in popularity since this article was published. I will say that it’s a bit addicting, Tumblr, but honestly, once I get into it, I find myself asking “what’s the point of this?”.

    Most people who use Tumblr just post random photos of stuff, which after a while, can become very boring. Plus, it’s time-consuming and it’s hard work. Looking for good photos is a drag. Most photos online are crappy low-res and look awful on sleek, aesthetically pleasing blogs.

    I do think that the Tumblr blog interface is very well organized and easy to follow, but there are times when I am just disinterested in the whole concept of it and I end up deleting my blog.

  13. Leon says:

    @Joey I’m still to bookmark or subscribe to a Tumblog.

    It is pretty good for topical sites (like http://katemiddletonforthewin.tumblr.com/ at around the time of the royal wedding.) Beyond that, it’s traditional blogs all the way for me.

  1. [...] Why I don’t like Tumblr & Posterous → Leon Paternoster. [...]

  2. [...] Why I don’t like Tumblr & Posterous → Leon Paternoster This entry was written by Dan Studnicky, posted on March 22, 2010 at 10:36 pm, filed under links, web and tagged blogging. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>