<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good web copy is boring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leonpaternoster.com/2010/05/good-web-copy-is-boring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leonpaternoster.com/2010/05/good-web-copy-is-boring/</link>
	<description>A blog about editing, managing and building web stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:07:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://leonpaternoster.com/2010/05/good-web-copy-is-boring/#comment-33264</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 19:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leonpaternoster.com/?p=1130#comment-33264</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment. Making your copy more to the point doesn&#039;t mean cutting out your key words; in theory the &lt;abbr title=&quot;Search Engine Optimisation&quot;&gt;SEO&lt;/abbr&gt;&#8211;friendly phrases aren&#039;t fluff and are important to the the reader anyway. Also, breaking up your text with headings is going to make the page&#039;s meaning clearer to search engines.

I personally retain modal boxes for dialogues (logins, for example) rather than as a means of providing further information as I think they can cause usability problems. And, as Ben says, if you&#039;re losing readers because your copy&#039;s flabby then it doesn&#039;t matter anyway.

Cheers,

Leon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment. Making your copy more to the point doesn&#8217;t mean cutting out your key words; in theory the <abbr title="Search Engine Optimisation">SEO</abbr>&ndash;friendly phrases aren&#8217;t fluff and are important to the the reader anyway. Also, breaking up your text with headings is going to make the page&#8217;s meaning clearer to search engines.</p>
<p>I personally retain modal boxes for dialogues (logins, for example) rather than as a means of providing further information as I think they can cause usability problems. And, as Ben says, if you&#8217;re losing readers because your copy&#8217;s flabby then it doesn&#8217;t matter anyway.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Leon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Locker</title>
		<link>http://leonpaternoster.com/2010/05/good-web-copy-is-boring/#comment-33263</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Locker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 18:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leonpaternoster.com/?p=1130#comment-33263</guid>
		<description>I agree about SEO, but keeping it simple isn&#039;t the same as writing short copy. 

Think about effective direct mail. Ogilvy&#039;s long copy advertisements. Great product guides. They all use long copy - but barely a word is wasted. 

So you get good sales copy, of a length that makes for good SEO. And if you&#039;ve done your keyword research before putting pen to paper, then even better. 

Agree slide-downs are handy for many page designs. I&#039;m certainly not above using them myself. But if it&#039;s a slide-down no-one wants to open, then it&#039;s not selling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about SEO, but keeping it simple isn&#8217;t the same as writing short copy. </p>
<p>Think about effective direct mail. Ogilvy&#8217;s long copy advertisements. Great product guides. They all use long copy &#8211; but barely a word is wasted. </p>
<p>So you get good sales copy, of a length that makes for good SEO. And if you&#8217;ve done your keyword research before putting pen to paper, then even better. </p>
<p>Agree slide-downs are handy for many page designs. I&#8217;m certainly not above using them myself. But if it&#8217;s a slide-down no-one wants to open, then it&#8217;s not selling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDM Marketing Evolved</title>
		<link>http://leonpaternoster.com/2010/05/good-web-copy-is-boring/#comment-33260</link>
		<dc:creator>JDM Marketing Evolved</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 17:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leonpaternoster.com/?p=1130#comment-33260</guid>
		<description>I see where you and Ben are going with applying the KISS principle to copy (Keep It Simple Stupid!).  However, from an SEO perspective, there&#039;s something to be said for a little more copy than you might otherwise like to see on the page.

The key is about limiting the visible content on a page to the really important stuff, but go ahead and offer the specifics in &quot;lightboxes&quot; or &quot;slide-downs&quot; (see our website for examples) so readers can dig into the stuff they want to know more about, and can skim over the basic info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see where you and Ben are going with applying the KISS principle to copy (Keep It Simple Stupid!).  However, from an SEO perspective, there&#8217;s something to be said for a little more copy than you might otherwise like to see on the page.</p>
<p>The key is about limiting the visible content on a page to the really important stuff, but go ahead and offer the specifics in &#8220;lightboxes&#8221; or &#8220;slide-downs&#8221; (see our website for examples) so readers can dig into the stuff they want to know more about, and can skim over the basic info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Locker</title>
		<link>http://leonpaternoster.com/2010/05/good-web-copy-is-boring/#comment-33259</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Locker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 15:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leonpaternoster.com/?p=1130#comment-33259</guid>
		<description>Good post - I agree. 

Don&#039;t dismiss the word &#039;new&#039;, though. Couple it with benefits and it can be quite a handy weapon in the copywriter&#039;s armoury – just look at how washing powder has been marketing for the past 60 years or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post &#8211; I agree. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t dismiss the word &#8216;new&#8217;, though. Couple it with benefits and it can be quite a handy weapon in the copywriter&#8217;s armoury – just look at how washing powder has been marketing for the past 60 years or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

